
I think your opinion of the new Indy film largely depends on just how much emotional investment you have in the character, and as such how high your expectations are. If you love Indy, then there is no way this can match up to your expectations, but if you're not a massive fan, then there's no reason that you shouldn't find this movie at least entertaining, because it is a lot of fun. Unfortunately it lives up to it's cliched description of being a rollercoaster ride, however this is more like Oblivion at Alton Towers, not the Big Dipper at Blackpool Pleasure Beach, because it goes from towering heights to agonizing depths in the blink of an eye (or should that be with the flip of a stomach?!) and so makes the film far from an enjoyable experience in the long run.
As a child of the 80s, my expectations were naturally sky high. I would go so far as to say I was probably more of an Indy fan than I was a Star Wars fan, and so I was probably as excited about seeing this as much, if not more, than I was about seeing the Star Wars prequels and in many ways, the sense of disappoinment is comparable. Now, before I go any further I want to go on record as saying I do not believe the Indy franchise to be flawless. Ok, so Raiders is pretty awesome, but Temple Of Doom is pretty cack (apart from the banquet scene and the mine cart chase), and Last Crusade, despite being my preferred choice for a number of years, has that really crappy ending with the invisible bridge - I mean, WTF guys!!
Unfortunately the Crystal Skull doesn't exactly get off to the best o f starts and for a franchise that is synonymous with strong opening scenes, this was probably the clunkiest and worst acted opening scene of any in the trilogy. Now let's be honest, I wasn't expecting something as iconic as the opening of Raiders, but I at least hope for some of the sparkle of Temple's dance routine or Crusade's young Indy flashback. Instead we got nothing but a formulaic run around an old warehouse with Ray Winstone being cockney and a couple of quick in-jokes for the fanboys. This was then followed by a random cameo by Alan 'Jim Robinson from Neighbours' Dale, which goes to show he really must have one hell of an agent!
At this point I was fearing the worst, however it did begin to pick up not long after that and I began to feel more positive. In part this was thanks to a great motorbike chase around the university campus, but more so, it was because Indy was back to doing what he did best, some good old fashioned archaeology action and riddle solving. Shia Le Beouf as Indy Jr. was introduced and wasn't too annoying and we seemed to be off on a quest and so all was good with the world of Indy again.
However that was soon undone by the 'Playstation Lite' chase scene in the jungle which was overdone with CGI and a need to have something that would appeal to the kids. In many ways, the evolution of the modern blockbuster can be seen when you compare this jungle chase scene with the tanks on horseback chase scene from Last Crusade. In that you got a feeling of 'reallism', that someone was actually hanging off the tank or being dragged along underneath. Whereas in this latests offering, where anything is possible because of digital composition, then a writers imagination can run wild with possible scenarios, which is not always a good thing. When Indy Jr., sorry Mutt, began getting hit in the nuts with cacti or swinging from ropes like a monkey I had flashbacks to James Bond waterskiing in Die Another Day and looking like a Playstation character and it ruined what was fast becoming an enjoyable part of the movie. OK, so I know it is Indy and it is supposed to be fantastical and unreallistic, however am I completely wrong for wanting a bit of 'reallism' in my fantasy action movie!!
And in many ways that theme continued on to the finale, which made Last Crusade's invisible bridge seem like cinema verite in comparison to this nonsense. Now, don't get me wrong, I don't have a problem with the 'aliens' storyline, that's fine. I'd just like it to be a little less ridiculous - this is supposed to be a film based in the real world, not a galaxy far, far away, after all!!. I guess it's the problem of having Hollywood's most successful film-makers working together, as no-one can reign them in and tell them not to go mental, and so inevitably you get a CGI spectacle which just seemed completely unnecessary and again put a dampener on my enjoyment of the movie just as I was beginning to like it again.
Unfortunately, they couldn't leave it there, as they had to ruin my day just that little bit more with the horribly cheesy wedding scene at the end. To say Karen Allen was a disappointment in this, is like saying Harrison Ford is only a 'little bit old'. She was truly awful throughout and goes to show just how little George Lucas knows about writing interesting characters these days as she was a hollow shadow of her previous self, left to spout cliched nonsense and generally be 'plucky' without having any kind of redeeming character traits whatsoever. She didn't even get to punch Indy in the face this time - which he deserved much, much more than he did the last time they were reunited!
Having said that though, she was still 10 times more relevant and more interesting than John Hurt's Oxley, who had about much purpose in the film as the titular crystal skulls and by the time it was all over he had not only forgotten that he was supposed to be in a relationship with Marion, but the audience had forgotten to care about who he was and what he was doing other than being John Hurt ad that he had a gnarly beard! In many ways, I wish I could now be afflicted with the same kind of selective amensia, because despite not hating this movie, I really which that I could forget it and pretend that it was all just a nasty psychic hallucination. I just hope there isn't another one in the pipeline, as I don't think I could handle the stress!